<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell phone tracking &#8220;perverse,&#8221; &#8220;misleading,&#8221; &#8220;contrived,&#8221; &#8220;unsupported&#8221; by law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law</link>
	<description>News, reviews and information for telephones, cell phones, phone cards, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:40:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/comment-page-1#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Recording of conversations and tracking via cell phone may be a common practice tool by so called &quot;law enforcement&quot;. It is a violation of rights to privacy and entrapment. Big Brother is alive and well in the USA. Our founding fathers would turn over in their graves if they knew what is being perpretrated and abused by officals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recording of conversations and tracking via cell phone may be a common practice tool by so called &#8220;law enforcement&#8221;. It is a violation of rights to privacy and entrapment. Big Brother is alive and well in the USA. Our founding fathers would turn over in their graves if they knew what is being perpretrated and abused by officals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Rushford</title>
		<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Rushford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law#comment-627</guid>
		<description>the govt should be talking to people the tracking is dangerous can cause health problems all these tracking sites (companies ) should be looked into. And the GOVT IS SUPPOSE TO CHECK THIS OUT BEFORE USING ANY OF THIS&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the govt should be talking to people the tracking is dangerous can cause health problems all these tracking sites (companies ) should be looked into. And the GOVT IS SUPPOSE TO CHECK THIS OUT BEFORE USING ANY OF THIS&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Department of Justice loses third cell phone tracking case - Phone Watch</title>
		<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Department of Justice loses third cell phone tracking case - Phone Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] The US Attorney for the SDNY faces an uphill battle: Two courts (the EDNY and the Southern District of Texas) have considered the government&#8217;s arguments so far, and both found them completely unpersuasive. Recognizing the importance of this decision, both magistrate judges urged an appeal in order to allow a Circuit Court to rule on this pernicious practice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The US Attorney for the SDNY faces an uphill battle: Two courts (the EDNY and the Southern District of Texas) have considered the government&#8217;s arguments so far, and both found them completely unpersuasive. Recognizing the importance of this decision, both magistrate judges urged an appeal in order to allow a Circuit Court to rule on this pernicious practice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Joy, the problem here is not that a criminal is doing anything wrong, but that the government is doing something wrong.

The government is supposed to have a reason to believe you might have committed a crime, or be in the process of committing a crime, before it begins such tracking. This is known as &quot;probable cause.&quot; In these cases, it did not have either. It was apparently doing surveillance on these people just to see what it could find.

The DOJ decided not to appeal either of these two decisions.

If you have done nothing wrong, the problem is that the government is doing something wrong, and must be kept in check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joy, the problem here is not that a criminal is doing anything wrong, but that the government is doing something wrong.</p>
<p>The government is supposed to have a reason to believe you might have committed a crime, or be in the process of committing a crime, before it begins such tracking. This is known as &#8220;probable cause.&#8221; In these cases, it did not have either. It was apparently doing surveillance on these people just to see what it could find.</p>
<p>The DOJ decided not to appeal either of these two decisions.</p>
<p>If you have done nothing wrong, the problem is that the government is doing something wrong, and must be kept in check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOY</title>
		<link>http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>JOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phone.ioerror.us/2005/10/cell-phone-tracking-perverse-misleading-contrived-unsupported-by-law#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I THINK IF YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG THEN WHAT&#039;S THE PROBLEM? THEY WOULD NOT BE CHECKING ON THESE PEOPLE UNLESS THEY HAVE A REASON. IF YOU ARE INNOCENT GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE UNLESS THEY HAD REASON TO CHECK ON YOU! OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM WILL LET ALOT OF PEOPLE GET THE SO CALLED LITTLE SLAP ON THE HAND AND I THINK IT IS TIME THEY INFORCE THE LAW TO THE FULL EXTENT. IF YOU DO THE CRIME THEN YOU SHOULD DO THE TIME!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK IF YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG THEN WHAT&#8217;S THE PROBLEM? THEY WOULD NOT BE CHECKING ON THESE PEOPLE UNLESS THEY HAVE A REASON. IF YOU ARE INNOCENT GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE UNLESS THEY HAD REASON TO CHECK ON YOU! OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM WILL LET ALOT OF PEOPLE GET THE SO CALLED LITTLE SLAP ON THE HAND AND I THINK IT IS TIME THEY INFORCE THE LAW TO THE FULL EXTENT. IF YOU DO THE CRIME THEN YOU SHOULD DO THE TIME!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
